People v. McCray
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that reversal is required because the People failed to include on their prospective witness list a witness who testified at trial. Because that contention was not properly raised at trial, it has not been preserved for our review (see, People v Graves, 85 NY2d 1024; People v Stephens, 84 NY2d 990, 991-992; People v Stewart, 81 NY2d 877, 878-879). Likewise unpreserved for our review is defendant’s contention that Supreme Court committed reversible error when it failed to ask the jurors whether they knew or were related to that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. GravesNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. YoungNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. StephensNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- People v. StewartNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. HarrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. HowardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. PlumeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- People v. CarmelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- People v. LostumboAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.