Rube v. Tornheim

In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Sacco, J.), dated February 8, 2008, which denied his objections to an order of the same court (Shamahs, S.M.) dated November 28, 2007, which, after a hearing, denied his motion for leave to conduct discovery.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court properly denied the father’s objections to the support magistrate’s order. Since the requested discovery is neither pertinent to any pending proceeding nor needed to…