Legal Opinion
Midtown Hospital v. Miller
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided July 24, 1997No. 1:97-cv-01786PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER OF THE COURT
FORRESTER, District Judge.
This action, brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, is before the court on Plaintiffs’ application for a temporary restraining order seeking to restrain the enforcement of a new Georgia statute regulating the circumstances under which certain procedures may be used to effect an abortion [5-1]. It is contended that this statute is void for vagueness and, further, that it violates the substantive due process rights of women to control their reproductive processes under principles first announced in Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 93 S.Ct. 705, 35 L.Ed.2d…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Northwestern Memorial Hospital v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Planned Parenthood of Central New Jersey v. VernieroDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Nat'l Abortion Fed v. Ashcroft, John D.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Nat'l Abortion Fed v. Ashcroft, John D.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Northwestern Memorial Hospital v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004