Randall v. Shropshire
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 32 — PETITION EQUITY cited Civil Code, sections 118,120, 123; Wilkes, Sheridan, Sfc. vs. Morehead, Mss. Opin., September, 1856. cited 3 Dana, 34; Title 5, Civil Code; Forkner vs. Hart, Mss. Opin., June, 1856; Wilson vs. Thompson, Mss. Opin., June, 1858; Civil-Code, sec. 113; 18 B. Mon., 555; Chism vs. Woods, Hardin.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIEE JUSTICE DUVALL
delivered the opinion of the court:
Shropshire, as the committee of Porter, a lunatic, brought this action, in the Bourbon Circuit court, against Mahoney and Ransdall, setting out three separate and distinct causes of action, in as many separate paragraphs, in his petition.
*328In the first paragraph, the plaintiff seeks to rescind a sale of land which had been made by Mahoney to Porter.
In the second, it is alleged that Mahoney had “got possession of a note for $500, in favor of said Porter, on the defendant, John Ransdall, due 1st March, 1858; said Mahoney collected on said…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Willis v. TomesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
- Caywood v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
- Williams v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942