Legal Opinion
East Timor Action Network, Inc. v. City of New York
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 3, 1999No. 99 CIV. 3664(RWS)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiff East Timor Action Network (“ETAN”) has moved, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for partial summary judgment, seeking a declaration that defendants the City of New York (“the City”), the New York City Department of Transportation (“DOT”), Wilbur Chapman, Commissioner of DOT (“Chapman”), and Robert Adamenko, Assistant Commissioner of the Office of Special Events of DOT (“Adamenko”), violated the Civil Rights Acts of 1871, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, by refusing to grant an application for erection of temporary street signs stating “1991…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Rosenberger v. Rector & Visitors of University of VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Southeastern Promotions, Ltd. v. ConradSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- City of Lakewood v. Plain Dealer Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Spencer Tunick v. Howard Safir, in His Official Capacity as the Police Commissioner of the City of New York, and the City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Hershey v. GoldsteinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals v. GiulianiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Cook v. BacaDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2000
- Doninger v. NiehoffDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.