R. Hughes, Inc. v. Mitchell
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
WEBSTER, Judge.
Appellant, defendant in the trial court, seeks review of a final judgment, entered pursuant to a jury verdict, awarding dam*768ages to appellee, as personal representative of her late son’s estate. Appellant argues, among other things, that the trial court should have granted its motion for a directed verdict because appellee presented no evidence from which one could reasonably conclude that appellant had sold or otherwise furnished any alcoholic beverage to appellee’s son (Richard). We agree. Accordingly, we reverse.
As personal representative of Richard’s estate, appellee filed a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Voelker v. Combined Ins. Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- RA Jones & Sons, Inc. v. HolmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Tucker Brothers, Inc. v. MenardSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
- Hooper v. Barnett Bank of West FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Diamond v. RosenfeldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Castillo v. EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2003
- Dade County School Employees Federal Credit Union v. ColemanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998