Lyndhurst City v. Beaumont
Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By THOMAS, J.
Convicted of the crime of driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor by a jury in the Lyndhurst Municipal Court the defendant appeals. He was charged under a Lyndhurst ordinance, which, in words substantially identical with §4511.19 R. C., provides that “no person who is under the influence of intoxicating liquor . . . shall operate any vehicle . . . within the city.”
His first assignment of error complains that the trial court lacked jurisdiction because no warrant was issued to charge him with an offense. This renews a complaint that was the basis of a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BuoySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- State v. TitakOhio Court of Appeals · 1955
- Hudson v. Cleveland (City)Ohio Court of Appeals · 1957
3Cited by1 opinion
- City of Toledo v. StarksOhio Court of Appeals · 1971