Legal Opinion

Lyndhurst City v. Beaumont

Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court

Decided August 25, 1959No. 70805PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By THOMAS, J.

Convicted of the crime of driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor by a jury in the Lyndhurst Municipal Court the defendant appeals. He was charged under a Lyndhurst ordinance, which, in words substantially identical with §4511.19 R. C., provides that “no person who is under the influence of intoxicating liquor . . . shall operate any vehicle . . . within the city.”

His first assignment of error complains that the trial court lacked jurisdiction because no warrant was issued to charge him with an offense. This renews a complaint that was the basis of a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BuoySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. State v. TitakOhio Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. Hudson v. Cleveland (City)Ohio Court of Appeals · 1957

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Toledo v. StarksOhio Court of Appeals · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API