Legal Opinion
United States v. Pedro Alvarez-Sanchez
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 15, 1992No. 89-50060PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
The defendant, Pedro Alvarez-Sanehez, was convicted after a jury trial of possession of counterfeit government obligations in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 472. During the trial, the government introduced in evidence a confession obtained while the defendant was in custody. The defendant had moved to suppress his confession on the ground that it was inadmissible under 18 U.S.C. § 3501 due to the delay between his arrest and arraignment. The district court denied the defendant’s motion, and he appeals that denial. ' We review de novo the district court’s decision to admit…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Mallory v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- United States v. Alvarez-SanchezSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jeffrey Howard VAN POYCK, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Susan Hallstrom Robert Hallstrom v. City of Garden City Randy W. Snapp Sgt. Thurston Vaughn Killeen, Sheriff Mike RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Manuel Gamez, A.K.A. Manuel Gamez-Rubio, Gustavo Gamez, Manuel Flores-Falvez, Manuel Gomez-Rubio, Manuel Flores-GalvezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Wright v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1993
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.