Legal Opinion
Ex parte Mayemura
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 9, 1931No. 6503PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ST. SURE, District Judge.
This is an appeal from an order of the District Court discharging a writ of habeas corpus and remanding appellant to the immigration authorities for deportation. The facts of the ease are similar to those in Ex parte Seisuke Fukumoto (C. C. A.) 53 F.(2d) 618, decided this day, and the authorities cited therein affirming the judgment apply with equal force here.
Appellant is a native and subject of Japan. He was arrested, and after a hearing was ordered deported by the Secretary of Labor upon the grounds: That he is in the United States in violation of the Immigration…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Bilokumsky v. TodSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- United States Ex Rel. Smith v. CurranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- Ghiggeri v. NagleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
- Ex parte FukumotoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
- Ng Mon Tong v. WeedinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930
3Cited by6 opinions
- Schoeps v. CarmichaelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- David Hyun v. Herman R. Landon, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Ex Parte BridgesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1943
- Ex parte SinghDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1935
- Schoeps v. CarmichaelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.