Legal Opinion

Wallace v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 24, 1925No. 4240PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

We are of the opinion that the first and second question must be answered in the negative. The proceedings against respondent Wallace are based upon the provisions of *575section 4897 of the Code of 1910, under which it was sought to remove him as clerk of the superior court for incapacity and misbehavior in office. The proceeding under this section, as held in Cobb v. Smith, 102 Ga. 585 (27 S. E. 763), is a quasi-criminal proceeding. Consequently the statute must be given a strict construction in behalf of and favorable to the respondent, or defendant. And neither the person upon whose relation…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mayor of Hawkinsville v. EthridgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  2. Lancaster v. HillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  3. Commissioners of Pilotage v. TabbottSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  4. Cobb v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Robitzsch v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  2. Cole v. HollandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
  3. Allen v. NorrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  4. Robitzsch v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  5. Wallace v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API