Legal Opinion

Chriswisser v. Pitts

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 20, 2013No. C111200RO; A149549PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant seeks reconsideration of our decision in Chriswisser v. Pitts, 258 Or App 676, 310 P3d 1162 (2013), in which we rejected his first assignment of error without discussion, reversed and remanded for entry of a judgment omitting a unitary assessment and offense surcharge as to his second and third assignments of error, and otherwise affirmed.

Defendant asserts that we should reconsider our decision in this case because, although defendant “failed to inform the court that he was withdrawing his second and third assignments of error,” after briefing was complete “the trial court entered…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. BaloghCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  2. Chriswisser v. PittsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wintle v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  2. Wintle v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API