Legal Opinion
Tydrich v. Bomkamp
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided December 27, 1996No. 96-2086PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDeininger, J.
Martin Tydrich appeals from a judgment awarding him damages under § 26.09, STATS., 1 for the unlawful cutting of thirty-five large maple trees on his farm. He claims the trial court erred in computing damages: (1) by deducting the cost of cutting the trees from the market value of the timber; and (2) by allowing an offset against double damages for the net amount Tydrich received upon sale of the timber. We conclude the damages awarded are not improper under § 26.09 and thus affirm the judgment.
BACKGROUND
There are no facts in dispute. Dennis Bomkamp was cutting trees on a farm adjoining…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Minuteman, Inc. v. AlexanderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
- Reiter v. DykenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- National Amusement Co. v. Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Pearce v. G. R. Kirk Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
- Boltz v. BoltzCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. SingerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
- Wisconsin Carry, Inc. v. City of MadisonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2015