Legal Opinion

Woodman v. Director of Revenue

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 30, 1999No. 56326PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, Judge.

Appellant Dolph Woodman appeals the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law of the Administrative Hearing Commission (AHC) holding him hable to the respondent for $29,247 in tax and penalties for willfully faihng to collect and pay employer withholding tax pursuant to § 143.751.4, RSMo 1994.1 The respondent is the Missouri Director of Revenue (Director), to whom the withholding tax returns and payments were due. Woodman made this appeal after filing a Motion for Reconsideration with the Administrative Hearing Commission. At issue is whether this appeal was timely…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. Mary Rem, Syma Lichter, and Nathan Hanfling, as Executors of the Estate of Henry Rem, Gerard RemCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  2. Richard D. Barnett v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  3. Richard L. Gephart v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  4. R. B. Industries, Inc. v. GoldbergSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  5. Farmer v. Barlow Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Rosenberg v. JarrettMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Jefferson City Apothecary, LLC d/b/a Jefferson City Apothecary and Uldis Pironis, R.Ph. v. Missouri Board of PharmacyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. De La Rosa, Javier Jr.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  4. Myrtis Williams v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2010
  5. Vossman v. State Board of PharmacyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API