Segal v. Davis
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Plaintiff sued to rescind a contract made with defendant and completely carried out. Thereby defendant obtained all the stock issued by Tbe Segal Dry Goods Company, a domestic corporation, and consequently came into possession of all its property, and plaintiff received a stated amount in cash, a farm subject to mortgages, and $6,000 in notes of the corporation, secured by a second mortgage executed by it upon a store building in Which its business bad been conducted. Tbe court found tbat defendant bad not been guilty of any fraud or misrepresentation as to tbe farm or in not giving bis…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Angle v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Darcy v. Brooklyn & New York Ferry Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Bank of St. Marys v. St. John, Powers & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1854
- Union Coal Co. v. WooleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- National New Haven Bank v. Northwestern Guaranty Loan Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hatch v. Morosco Holding Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Willeams v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Brown County Bank v. Freie Presse Printing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Hatch v. Morosco Holding Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931