Legal Opinion

State v. Tarrence

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 7, 1999No. 9607-34975; CA A97637PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

Defendant seeks reversal of her conviction of Forgeiy I. ORS 165.013. We reverse the conviction of Forgery I and, on stipulation by defendant that her actions constitute Forgery II, a misdemeanor, we remand to the trial court for entry of a judgment of conviction for Forgery II.1

Defendant concedes that in April 1995 she cashed a forged state unemployment check in the amount of $267. The sole issue on appeal is whether that constitutes Forgery I, a Class C felony under ORS 165.013. With questions of statutory construction, our task is to discern the intent of the legislature by examining the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Gaston v. ParsonsOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. WebbOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Vannatta v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. HarbertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. Gonzalez-AguillarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. State v. TorrezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API