State v. Tarrence
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.
Defendant seeks reversal of her conviction of Forgeiy I. ORS 165.013. We reverse the conviction of Forgery I and, on stipulation by defendant that her actions constitute Forgery II, a misdemeanor, we remand to the trial court for entry of a judgment of conviction for Forgery II.1
Defendant concedes that in April 1995 she cashed a forged state unemployment check in the amount of $267. The sole issue on appeal is whether that constitutes Forgery I, a Class C felony under ORS 165.013. With questions of statutory construction, our task is to discern the intent of the legislature by examining the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Gaston v. ParsonsOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. WebbOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- Vannatta v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. HarbertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. Gonzalez-AguillarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- State v. TorrezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013