Legal Opinion

Searcy v. South Carolina Department of Education

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided February 11, 1991No. 1608PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Goolsby, Judge:

This action by April Granger Searcy involves the South Carolina Tort Claims Act. S.C. CODE ANN. §§ 15-78-10 to -190 (Supp. 1990). The trial court, based on S.C. Code Ann. Section 15-78-110 (Supp. 1986), 1 granted the Transportation Division of the South Carolina Department of Education summary judgment because Searcy failed to commence this action within two years after the date she discovered her loss. In holding her action time-barred, the trial court rejected Searcy’s contention that she had three years from the date of loss within which to bring this action because she had…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McCall v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  2. Cochran v. City of SumterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  3. Braudie v. Richland CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
  4. State v. CockranCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1828

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Browning Ex Rel. Estate of Browning v. HartvigsenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  2. Vines v. Self Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  3. Joubert v. South Carolina Department of Social ServicesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
  4. Rink v. Richland Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  5. Pollard v. County of FlorenceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API