Richards v. Stokes
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal "by the plaintiffs, George Richards and others, from an ©rder of the Supreme Court, made at the Hew York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Hew York on the 16th day of December, 1895, denying the plaintiffs’ motion for an ©rder referring the issues in this action to a referee.
1Opinion of the Court
Van Brunt, P. J.:
This action was brought by the plaintiffs, who are co-partners in business as attorneys and counselors at law, to recover for professional services alleged to have been performed by the plaintiffs for the •defendant, and for which payment has not been made.
The defendant, in his answer, admits the retainer of the plaintiffs, ®r some of them, and the rendition of services, but denies any knowledge or information of the details and particulars of the same as contained in the plaintiffs’ bill of particulars, except as they were in the answer thereinafter admitted. The answer…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Lewis v. SnookAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Prentice v. HuffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
- Nicoll v. HaasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Hoar v. WallaceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- Hoff v. Robert H. Reid & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905