State v. Sorenson
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.
We granted the petition for further review of the appellant, Kenneth G. Sorenson. The Nebraska Court of Appeals affirmed the sentences imposed by the Douglas County District Court, finding that the oral pronouncement of sentence was ambiguous, but that the oral pronouncement was clarified by the written journal entry which set forth the sentences.
SCOPE OF REVIEW
When statutory language is plain and unambiguous, no judicial interpretation is needed to ascertain the statute’s meaning. In the absence of a statutory indication to the contrary, words in a statute will be given their ordinary…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. TrevinoNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. HaynieNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. SalyersNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. StrattonNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. McNernyNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. DeckerNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. WoodsNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. RussellNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. MarksNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. ClarkNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.