Bethesda Hospital Ass'n v. Preston

Before the Court of Appeals, appellant contended that:

“The only question in this cause, is the appellant entitled to interest on damage to the residue from the date of take * * * to date of payment * * *.” (Deletions ours.)

In this court, appellant sets out five assignments of error. These, however, raise only two issues: (1) That which pertains to ascertainment of interest, and (2) the conclusion of the Court of Appeals that the provision of Section 19, Article I of the Constitution of Ohio, relative to the determination of compensation by a jury, is mandatory.

The probable basis for the…