Jeremy Patrick Shakesnider v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Kem Thompson Frost, Chief Justice
Appellant Jeremy Patrick Shakesnider appeals his conviction for burglary of a habitation. In two issues appellant contends (1) the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction, and (2) the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury on asserted lesser-included offenses. We affirm.
I. Factual and PROCEDURAL Background
The complainant testified that on the day of the offense she parked her car in her home’s garage, leaving the garage door open. Police officers came to her door later in the afternoon and alerted her to a burglary. She looked at…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Wesbrook v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Sharp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Matson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- McDuff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Hall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Andrus v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Alberto Palacio v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2019
- Daniel William Mohler v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2020
- Michael Mauricio Martinez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2021
- State v. Dana Lee Ingram, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.