Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Consumer Rights, LLC v. Bradford County

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 17, 2014No. 1D14-2049Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBenton, J.

I would reverse and remand for further proceedings, including on the claim for an injunction. Merely furnishing the public records requested more than two months after they were requested does not render the case moot. See Mazer v. Orange Cnty., 811 So.2d 857, 859-60 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) (holding “the fact that the requested documents were produced ... after the action was commenced, but prior to final adjudication ... does not render the case moot”); Soud v. Kendale, Inc., 788 So.2d 1051, 1053 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001); Puls v. City of Port St. Lucie, 678 So.2d 514, 514 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Wisner…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mazer v. Orange CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  2. Rhea v. District Board of TrusteesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  3. Havens v. FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  4. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. BohatkaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  5. Diplomat Properties Ltd. Partnership v. Tecnoglass, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API