Legal Opinion

Fanning v. Poe

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 17, 1935No. 7604PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

Appellant is an attorney and counselor at law, duly admitted to practice as such in the courts of the state of New York. Authorized by the court of their appointment, the Baltimore city court of Baltimore, Md., to do so, Bushman and Poe, receivers for Hambleton & Co., retained and appointed him to, represent them in the court of bankruptcy in the defense and collection of Ham-bleton & Co.’s claims against Lane Drug Stores, Inc., bankrupt.

Having gotten into a controversy with the receivers over the amount of his fee, no amount having been fixed in the order authorizing…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lynde v. LyndeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1902
  2. In Re GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Webster v. SweatCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
  4. Brooks v. Mandel-Witte Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  5. Missouri v. AngleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lubbock Hotel Co. v. Guaranty Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API