Legal Opinion

Wortley v. Kieffer

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1975No. 149 (1974)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

The questions raised on the appeal are first, whether the court after the hearing in an estate claim, having given a decision from the bench, properly reopened the matter for the taking of further testimony; and second, whether the testimony adduced was sufficient to establish a guaranty contract for the payment of a promissory note.

Under date of September 22, 1964, Charles Ranieri signed a document entitled “Chattel Mortgage” promising Judith Kieffer, who had loaned him $8,000 for purposes of investment in his business, to repay her on or before September 22, 1969, with interest on the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Reece, Adm'r v. ReeceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  2. International Textbook Co. v. MabbottWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Kochel v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Miami County National Bank v. GoldbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Yenner v. HammondWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McLellan v. CharlyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008
  2. John Deere Co. v. BabcockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Tissue Tech. LLC v. TAK Invs. LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2018
  4. Amato v. Creative Confections Concepts, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2000
  5. EuroChem North America Corp. v. Ganske, JulieDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API