Hill v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion
OPINION ON REHEARING
In his motion for rehearing, Hill complains in three points of error that our reliance on article 1.14 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure in affirming his conviction is in error, because the article is not intended to apply to indictments which are insufficient to allege a criminal offense. He asserts that to hold otherwise amounts to a denial of his right to an indictment by a grand jury as guaranteed to him by article I, section 10 of the Texas Constitution, and that it allows him to be bound over for trial without due course of the law of the land as set out in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Landry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Shaw v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1987
- Spelling v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Milam v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
- Gomez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1987