Legal Opinion

Huginnie v. Loyd

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 29, 1972No. 635Published

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

Appellant, in his motion for rehearing says that the holding of this court “that the doctrine of apparent authority is not applicable in a case dealing with the sale of land, in reliance on the case of Bugh v. Word * * * ” is error. He argues that the holding in Bugh v. Word is limited to transactions dealing with a licensed real estate agent or broker and therefore has no application to Miss Baldwin in the instant case, who is not alleged or intimated in any way to have been a licensed real estate agent or broker.

The rule of law here in question applies to any agent…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bugh v. WordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  2. Goode v. Westside Developers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  3. O'Connor v. CampCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. Pair v. Caraway Drilling Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  5. Warren Mfg. Co. v. HooverCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API