Legal Opinion

Royal Arcanum v. Vitzthum

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 17, 1916PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore Oily. (Sopee, C. J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPattison, J.

Upon the application of William Vitzthum, a certificate -of membership in the Royal Arcanum, a fraternal benefit ■association was;, on the 16th day of November, 1889, issued to him. The certificate provided that upon the conditions therein mentioned, his wife, Louisa O. Vitzthum was to be paid at his death, out of the Widows and Orphans Benefit Fund, the sum of three thousand dollars ($3,000).

In his application is found the following clause: I do hereby * * * agree that * * * any concealment of facts by me in this application, or my suspension or expulsion, from, or voluntarily severing my…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lange v. HighlandersNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Supreme Conclave v. RehanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
  3. Arold v. Supreme Conclave Improved Order of HeptasophsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Steen v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Hannon v. Grand Lodge of the Ancient Order of United WorkmenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  3. Steuernagel v. Supreme Council of the Royal ArcanumNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  4. New Baltimore Loan & Savings Ass'n v. TraceyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1923
  5. Shapiro v. Independent Order, Brith Abraham of United StatesAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API