Legal Opinion

Borden v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 16, 1980No. 79-649PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACK, Associate Judge:

Appellants/taxpayers dispute the District of Columbia’s determination that the sale of certain collateral held by a bank was a taxable event for them. The bank mistakenly sold appellants’ pledged securities and, upon discovery of the error, repurchased the stock. The trial court agreed with the District that the bank’s action constituted a sale and later repurchase of the stock by the taxpayers. 1 Appellants argue that the bank’s action constituted a tax free exchange of stock. 2 Although we disagree with the characterization of these transactions by both parties, we…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Woodward v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Redwing Carriers, Inc. v. TomlinsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  4. Bell Lines, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
  5. M. G. STOLLER, Magdalene Stoller, Kenneth M. Stoller and Ellsworth J. Stoller v. the UNITED STATESUnited States Court of Claims · 1963

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cordova v. Lee Galles Oldsmobile, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Schreiber Family Charitable Foundation v. First Financial Acceptance Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1997
  3. Vinson v. McCartyMississippi Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API