Legal Opinion
Hawthorne Savings & Loan Ass'n v. City of Signal Hill
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 4, 1993No. B066509PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JOHNSON, J .
This is anappeal by Hawthorne Savings and Loan Association (Hawthorne) from a judgment denying a peremptory writ of mandate under section 1094.5 of the Code of Civil Procedure and thereby affirming the City of Signal Hill’s order requiring demolition of substandard residential buildings belonging to Hawthorne. We issued an order staying demolition of the buildings pending disposition of this appeal. We now reverse the judgment denying the writ and remand the matter to the superior court for further proceedings.
Facts and Proceedings Below
Hawthorne is the owner of improved…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Woods v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Franz v. Board of Medical Quality AssuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Savelli v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Green v. City of OceansideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Leppo v. City of PetalumaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Village of Lake Villa v. StokovichIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
- City of Santa Monica v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Erlach v. Sierra Asset Servicing, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Village Trailer Park, Inc. v. Santa Monica Rent Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- D & M FINANCIAL CORP. v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.