Legal Opinion

Alsup v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 29, 1928PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Appellant was convicted of operating an employment agency without procuring a license authorizing him so to do, in violation of act No. 4, Acts Special Session of 1923, page 3.

It is not contended that the act in question was passed as a revenue measure imposing an occupation tax. Sims v. Ahrens, 167 Ark. 557, 271 S. W. 720. It is insisted that, while the act was passed in an attempt to exercise the State’s police power, it is in excess of that power and is violative of the 14th Amendment to the Federal 'Constitution. The essential provisions of the act are as follows:

Section 1 prohibits the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ribnik v. McBrideSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Nixon v. AllenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  3. Sims v. AhrensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  4. Marshall v. HollandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hogue v. the Housing Auth. of North Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
  2. Jernigan v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  3. Conway County Bridge District v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  4. Conway County Bridge District v. FullertonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
  5. Arkansas Department of Labor v. American Employment AgencySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API