Legal Opinion

Miller v. ICON Clinical Research LLC

District Court, N.D. California

Decided August 20, 2020No. 4:20-cv-04117Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 CHRYSTAL L. MILLER, CASE NO. 20-cv-04117-YGR 6 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR REMAND 7 vs. Re: Dkt. Nos. 9, 13 8 ICON CLINICAL RESEARCH LLC, ET AL., 9 Defendants. 10 Plaintiff Chrystal Miller brings this wage-and-hour putative class action against defendants 11 ICON plc (“ICON”); ICON Clinical Research, LLC (“ICON Clinical”); DOCS Global Inc.; and 12 Lynda Holcroft. The complaint alleges that ICON employed plaintiff as a Clinical Research 13 Associate (“CRA”) from approximately October 9, 2017 through March 19, 2019,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Solomon Lew v. Stanton Moss and Harlean MossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. Jose Mondragon v. Capital One Auto FinanceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  3. Serrano v. 180 Connect, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. Coleman v. Estes Express Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. Celena King v. Great American Chicken Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API