Legal Opinion

Labarre Plantation Partnership v. Amoco Production Co.

District Court, M.D. Louisiana

Decided December 31, 1986No. 86-655-BPublished

1Opinion of the Court

POLOZOLA, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on the motion of the plaintiff, Labarre Plantation Partnership (“Labarre”), to remand. No oral argument is required on this motion. The court finds plaintiff’s motion to remand should be granted.

Labarre originally filed this suit in the Eighteenth Judicial District Court of Louisiana, alleging various claims relating to certain mineral leases. The defendants, Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation (“Columbia”), and Amoco Production Company (“Amoco”), timely removed the case to this court. Labarre has now filed this motion to remand…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Great Southern Fire Proof Hotel Company v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. United Steelworkers of America v. R. H. Bouligny, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Puerto Rico v. Russell & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Empire Rice Mill Co. v. K. & E. NeumondDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API