Legal Opinion

People v. Gonzalez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 26, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*469Defendant’s guilt was proven by legally sufficient evidence and the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490).

The court’s pre-voir dire instructions to the jury do not require reversal. Although the court was ill-advised in going into unnecessary detail as to the evidence that the prosecutor intended to offer at trial and the possibility of a "contrary” view, the court’s, additional explicit instructions to the jurors, that the evidence will come "from the witness stand * * * not me” and that a defendant in a criminal case has no burden to prove…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. TownsendNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. People v. ComptonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. MurrayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. People v. WarwickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API