Legal Opinion
Isla v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 12, 2016No. 5D15-1191PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
AFFIRMED. See Golden v. State, 84 So.3d 396, 398 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (“Assuming arguendo that the trial court properly allowed Golden’s counsel- to adopt'the pro se motion, the effective- date of an adopted pro se motion is the date it is adopted- and not the initial date the unauthorized pleading was filed.”).
LAWSON, C.J., TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Golden v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cornelius v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Clifton Cornelius v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017