Binion v. Sasaki
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, P. J.
The trial court awarded judgment for defendants in an action for damages for negligence in selling vegetables impregnated with arsenic and upon an alleged warranty that they were fit for human consumption. Plaintiff appeals.
Plaintiff’s husband purchased the vegetables; his wife, the plaintiff, ate of them and became ill. The findings assume, rather than assert, that arsenic was in or on the vegetables when purchased. We therefore make the same assumption.
Upon competent evidence the findings absolve defendants from the charge of negligence. (Minutilla v. Providence Ice Cream Co., 50 R. I. 43…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Chysky v. . Drake Brothers Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Minutilla v. Providence Ice Cream Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1929
- Welshausen v. Charles Parker Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
- Rhodes v. Libby, McNeill & LibbyOregon Supreme Court · 1929
3Cited by1 opinion
- Binion v. SasakiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935