Legal Opinion

Mojica v. The Palladium

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 27, 1992PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Phyl*797lis Gangel-Jacob, J.), entered April 16, 1991, denying the motion of defendant Muidallap Corporation, doing business as The Palladium to dismiss the complaint as time-barred, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendant-appellant dismissing and severing the complaint as to it.

Plaintiff seeks to recover damages for injuries allegedly sustained on January 10, 1987 as a result of the acts of certain individuals who were employees of the defendant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rachlin v. OrtizAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Plitman v. LeibowitzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API