Legal Opinion

Carey v. City of Richmond

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1883No. 10,600PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the "Wayne Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Franklin, C.

Appellants Carey and wife sued the city of Richmond and three of its police officers for an assault and battery upon, and the unlawful arrest and false imprisonment of, the wife.' A demurrer was sustained to the complaint as to the city of Richmond. On motion of the defendants (the police officers) portions of the complaint were stricken out. Two additional paragraphs to the complaint were then filed. An answer in three paragraphs was'filed: 1st. A denial. 2d.-Justification under the vagrant act of 1877. 3d. Justification under an ordinance of the city.

A demurrer was overruled to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Harness v. State ex rel. PlattIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Metzer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Harper v. HarperIndiana Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Diehl v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  2. SHELBY NAT'L. BK., ADM. v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Terre Haute Electric Railway Co. v. LauerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
  4. Featherstone Foundry & Machine Co. v. CriswellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API