Gritz v. Hot Shoppes, Inc.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Associate Judge.
This action was brought to recover damages allegedly sustained,by plaintiffs in eating food while customers in defendant’s restaurant. From a verdict and judgment awarding plaintiffs $1 each, they bring this appeal. .
The record shows.that bn July 8, 1954, plaintiffs visited defendant’s restaurant and were served waffles. Plaintiffs testified that the waffles “tasted and smelled like they contained carbolic acid”; that each of them consumed approximately one-half waffle while noticing the peculiar taste and odor; that they received burns about the mouth and became ill,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fairmount Glass Works v. Cub Fork Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Chambers v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1916
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bernard v. CalkinsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Cunningham Ex Rel. Cunningham v. ConnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
- Moore v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Anthony v. Allstate Insurance Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- Wisdom v. ArmstrongDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.