Legal Opinion

Gritz v. Hot Shoppes, Inc.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 23, 1955No. 1673PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Associate Judge.

This action was brought to recover damages allegedly sustained,by plaintiffs in eating food while customers in defendant’s restaurant. From a verdict and judgment awarding plaintiffs $1 each, they bring this appeal. .

The record shows.that bn July 8, 1954, plaintiffs visited defendant’s restaurant and were served waffles. Plaintiffs testified that the waffles “tasted and smelled like they contained carbolic acid”; that each of them consumed approximately one-half waffle while noticing the peculiar taste and odor; that they received burns about the mouth and became ill,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fairmount Glass Works v. Cub Fork Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Chambers v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1916

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bernard v. CalkinsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Cunningham Ex Rel. Cunningham v. ConnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Moore v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  4. Anthony v. Allstate Insurance Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Wisdom v. ArmstrongDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API