Salomon Ledezma-Cosino v. Jefferson Sessions
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1DissentThomas, Chief Judge
The government proposes to bar the petitioner from immigration relief simply because is he a recovering alcoholic. It reasons that, because he was diagnosed with the disease during the qualifying period, he categorically must be labeled a “habitual drunkard,” and is per se ineligible for cancellation of removal as someone who lacks good moral character. But the terms *1054“alcoholic” and “habitual drunkard” are not synonymous, either as a matter of immigration law, or as a matter of fact. For that reason, I would grant the petition for review and remand for the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”)…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. National Sea Clammers Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- King v. BurwellSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Maricela M. Fernandez, Danelia Fernandez Covarrubias v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- S. D. Warren Co. v. Maine Board of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- RECINASBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.