Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Santiago Gonzales Castro

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 5, 1956No. 63, Docket 23654Published

1ConcurrenceFrank, Circuit Judge

I concur in the result. I am filing this concurring opinion because I want to express my disagreement with the doctrine stated in the majority opinion. I admit that the occasions when that doctrine will have significance for an upper court will be few, but I consider the doctrine too inflexible .to do justice in those few cases. The doctrine has been long established by the decisions of this court. We have often held as follows:(1) The trial judge commits reversible error if he does not instruct the jurors that, in order to find the accused guilty, they must conclude that his guilt has been…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Schneiderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Baumgartner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Deering v. Winona Harvester WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Pierce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API