Legal Opinion

Mississippi Commission on Judicial Performance v. Mary H. Curry

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 2018No. 2018-JP-00194-SCTPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT:

¶ 1. The Mississippi Commission on Judicial Performance (Commission) filed a formal complaint against Justice Court Judge Mary Curry. The complaint outlined multiple allegations of misconduct on the part of Judge Curry, and ultimately, the Commission and Judge Curry entered into an agreed stipulation of facts, with a proposed recommendation of a public reprimand. The Commission and Judge Curry filed a joint motion for approval of the recommendation with the Court. We accept and affirm the Commission's recommendation of a public reprimand.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re BaileyMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
  2. COM'N ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE v. SanfordMississippi Supreme Court · 2006
  3. COMMISSION ON JUD. PERFORMANCE v. CowartMississippi Supreme Court · 2006
  4. MISS. COM'N ON JUD. PERFORMANCE v. BrownMississippi Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Mississippi Commission on Judicial Performance v. DarbyMississippi Supreme Court · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mississippi Commission on Judicial Performance v. Jimmy McGeeMississippi Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Mississippi Commission on Judicial Performance v. Carlos E. Moore, Municipal Court JudgeMississippi Supreme Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API