Legal Opinion

Fields v. CSX Transportation, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 19, 2010No. 93813PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Colleen Conway Cooney, Judge.

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, CSX Transportation, Inc. (“CSX”), appeals the trial court’s denial of its motion to administratively dismiss the complaint of plaintiffappellee, Pearl Fields (“Pearl”), the representative of the estate of Paul Fields. Finding merit to the appeal, we reverse and remand.

{¶ 2} In June 2008, Pearl brought an action against CSX under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act and the Locomotive Inspection Act, alleging that CSX negligently allowed her husband, Paul, to be exposed to various substances, including asbestos and asbestos dust, while…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. MuncieOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Sinnott v. Aqua-Chem, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Penn v. A-Best Prods. Co., 07ap-404 (12-31-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fields v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Fields v. CSX Transp., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API