Legal Opinion

Ray v. City of Wichita

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 9, 1933No. 31,358PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*687The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

This case involves the interpretation of R. S. 12-105, which provides in substance that no action can be maintained against a city on account of injury to- person or property unless the person or corporation injured shall within three months thereafter file with the city clerk a written statement giving the time and place of the happening of the accident or injury received and the circumstances relating thereto.

In her petition Stella Ray alleged that at 10:30 a. m. on March 7,1932, she was injured when she stepped into a hole in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Parkhill v. Town of BrightonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
  2. English v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  3. Glore v. George B.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Hook v. BixbySupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
  5. De Bang v. ScriptureMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Adams v. City of Arkansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  2. Hibbs v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  3. Hubbard v. Estate of HavlikSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  4. Mike's Mfg. Co. v. ZimzorisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
  5. Workman v. City of EmporiaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API