Rung v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and defendant A. E. Wilson and Company, Limited’s motion denied. Memorandum: The court erred in dismissing the complaint, amended complaint and cross claims against defendant A. E. Wilson and Company, Limited (Wilson) on the ground that it was not subject to the jurisdiction of New York courts. The underlying facts are as follows: Wilson is a Canadian insurance agency through which plaintiffs obtained insurance from defendant United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. (USF&G) on cars licensed and insured in Canada. Plaintiffs own a residence in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Parke-Bernet Galleries, Inc. v. FranklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
- Peterson v. Spartan Industries, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. LiMauroNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Hollander v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. LiMauroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Caronia v. American Reliable InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1998
- Reyes v. Sanchez-PenaNew York Supreme Court · 2002
- Staten Island Hospital v. Alliance Brokerage Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Longview Fibre Co. v. Triple R IndustriesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Mingmen Acupuncture Services, P. C. v. American Transit InsuranceCivil Court of the City of New York · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.