Legal Opinion

Evangeline Oil Co. v. Trahan

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 9, 1910No. 18,173PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action by the Evangeline Oil Company against Albert Trahan, Assessor, and others. On application of defendants for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBreaux, C. J.

The plaintiffs in the suit, originally respondents, here move to dismiss the application for a writ of review on the ground that it was not timely filed and that it cannot be entertained.

This court has said that under article 101 of the Constitution applications must be filed in the clerk’s office of the Supreme Court not later than 30 days after the final decision of the Court of Appeal has been noted on the minutes, or after refusal of application for a rehearing. Rimmer v. Jones Bros., 117 La. 910, 42 South. 421; Landry v. Ramos, 124 La. 599, 50 South. 593; section 2, Act 191, of 1898.

Consi…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rimmer v. Jones Bros.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
  2. Landry v. Ramos Lumber & Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1909

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Trimble v. Employers Mut. Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1948
  2. P. W. Holliday & Sons, Ltd. v. JoffrionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API