Legal Opinion

Kaemmerer v. Kaemmerer

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1907PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the Fourth District;—heard in that court on appeal from the City Court of East St. Louis; the Hon. W. J. N. Moyers, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cartwright

On May 3, 1894, the Modern Woodmen of America, a corporation organized under the provisions of the act relating to fraternal beneficiary societies, in force July 1, 1883, issued, a benefit certificate to Hartmann Kaemmerer for the sum of $2000, in which his wife, Kate Kaemmerer, was designated as beneficiary. In December, 1895, Kate Kaemmerer died, leaving five children of her marriage with said Hartmann Kaemmerer. In July, 1899, Kaemmerer married Pink A. Mott, with whom he lived for a few months and from whom he was afterwards divorced. On December 31, 1903, he married Mary V. Vail, with…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Alexander v. ParkerIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Baldwin v. BegleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Washburn & Moen Manufacturing Co. v. Chicago Galvanized Wire Fence Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Benton v. Brotherhood of Railroad BrakemenIllinois Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pritchard v. FruitAppellate Court of Illinois · 1919
  2. Bildhauer v. Slovenska Narodna Podporna JednotaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1924
  3. Haley v. Supreme Court of HonorAppellate Court of Illinois · 1908
  4. Smith v. Our United BrotherhoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  5. Smith v. Our United BrotherhoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API