Legal Opinion

People v. Harris

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 22, 1993PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Smith, J.

The issue in this CPL 30.30 appeal is whether the People may delay producing the Grand Jury minutes in response to a defendant’s CPL 210.30 motion to inspect and dismiss until after the court specifically orders them to do so. The Appellate Division dismissed the indictment on the basis of our decision in People v McKenna (76 NY2d 59) where we held that the People’s postreadiness delay in failing to provide Grand Jury minutes to the court, when added to the prereadiness delay, violated CPL 30.30’s strictures and required the dismissal of the indictment. Because…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. McKennaNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. People v. HowellNew York Court of Appeals · 1958

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. People v. DearstyneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. People v. DouglasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. People v. SuttonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. People v. BeasleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. People v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API