Leake v. Carlisle
City of New York Municipal Court
Action by Richard F. Leake against John G. Carlisle. Motion to set aside verdict and for new trial. Granted.
1Opinion of the CourtO’Dwyer, J.
Motion to set aside a verdict and for a new trial. In actions brought to recover damages for alleged malicious prosecutions, the plaintiff, in order to succeed, must prove want of probable cause and malice. Malice in fact is the kind of malice which is to be proved. When malice is and may be inferred from the want of probable cause, it is actual malice which is thus proved. The plaintiff’s cause of action depending upon proof of these two facts, defendant was entitled to offer any testimony that was competent as evidence to disprove want of probable cause or malice. Upon the trial the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dillon v. . AndersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
- Thurston v. . CornellNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
- McKown v. . HunterNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
- Bayliss v. . CockcroftNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Bedell v. . ChaseNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Runo v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Schubkegel v. GordinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943