Legal Opinion

Fox Painting Company and Fox Painting and Decorating, Inc., Cross-Respondents/appellants v. National Labor Relations Board, Cross-Applicant/appellee

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 9, 1994No. 92-6083PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENNEDY, Circuit Judge.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1963, the National Labor Relations Board (the “Board”) registered in the District Court a judgment of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, which enforced an order of the Board against appellants Fox Painting Company and Fox Painting and Decorating, Inc. (collectively “Fox”) 1 , in the District Court. Fox filed a Motion to Stay Proceedings and a Motion to Set Aside Registration on the ground that the District Court was not authorized to register a judgment of the court of appeals. We agree that section 1963 does not authorize a district court to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fox Painting Company and Fox Painting and Decorating, Inc., and v. National Labor Relations Board, and Cross-ApplicantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Fox Painting CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  3. Fox Painting Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1992

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Caballero v. Fuerzas Armadas RevolucionariaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  2. Continental Casualty Co. v. Argentine RepublicDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2012
  3. Woo v. SpackmanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
  4. Marbury Law Group, PLLC v. CarlDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  5. Atkinson v. KestellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API