Airoldi v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MIKE AIROLDI, Case No. 24-cv-00429-EMC 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 9 v. MOTION TO REMAND 10 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Docket No. 14 11 Defendant. 12 13 14 The instant case is related to Benter v. United Parcel Service, Inc., No. C-24-0375 EMC 15 (N.D. Cal.). Like the plaintiff in Benter, Mr. Airoldi has made a single claim of failure to 16 reimburse business expenses, specifically, cell phone expenses ($50/month). Like the plaintiff in 17 Benter, Mr. Airoldi initiated proceedings against UPS before the…