Legal Opinion
Adams v. Middlebrooks
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided March 4, 2016No. 11-5268PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGMENT
This appeal was considered on the record of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs and oral arguments of the parties. The court has afforded the issues full consideration and has determined that they do not warrant a published opinion. See D.C.Cir. Rule 36(d). For the reasons stated below, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the judgment of the district court be affirmed.
On November 15, 2010, Adams filed a habeas petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 alleging, among other things, ineffective assistance of appellate counsel (“IAAC”) in his appeal to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- McQuiggin v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Calderon v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Williams v. MartinezCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bellinger v. BowserDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Colombini v. MeinkDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
- Noha v. Ronald Reagan-Washington National AirportDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
- Noha v. Washington Dulles International AirportDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
- Rhodora Colombini v. Troy E. Meink, Secretary of the Air Force, et al.District Court, D. Maryland · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.